Reblogged from Think.

Reblogged from Think.

I’m at the grocery store with my grandparents and my grandpa has wandered away and now my grandma is going up every isle yelling his name and im hiding behind a cookie display cuz i dont want anyone to know im with the crazy woman screaming dick at the top of her lungs

Reblogged from (◕‿◕✿)~~~~~~~~~~~

… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.

So you might end up with more donuts.

But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?

Hrm.

HRM.

A round donut with radius R

_{1}occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R_{1}. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R_{2}and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R_{2}, then the area of a round donut is πR_{1}^{2}- πr_{2}^{2}. The area of a square donut would be then 4R_{1}^{2}- 4R_{2}^{2}. This doesn’t say much, but in general and throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.

The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (R_{2}= R_{1}/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR_{1}^{2}/16 ≃ 2,94R_{1}^{2}, square: 15R_{1}^{2}/4 = 3,75R_{1}^{2}). Now, assuming a large center hole (R_{2}= 3R_{1}/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR_{1}^{2}/16 ≃ 1,37R_{1}^{2}, square: 7R_{1}^{2}/4 = 1,75R_{1}^{2}). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.

tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.Thank you donut side of Tumblr.

Reblogged from hi i used to be jakemalik

the-perks-of-being-a-fangirl2:

this test has some downright confusing english but it seems to be more or less accurate if you can figure out the questions and answer them right

Real Age: 19

Mental Age: 23real age: 16

mental age: 21Real Age: 14

Mental age: 35

damnReal Age: 19

Mental age: 34

WelpReal Age: 19

Mental age: 27

Sounds about right. Lawl.

real age: 25

mental age: 30

darn i was almost convinced i’d be younger XD;;; but that’s not so bad, i’m where i should be at least then

Real age: 22

Mental age: 31Too worried they say.

Real Age: 15Mental Age:24Very Mature apparently…Real Age: 19

Mental Age: 18

Carefree, apparently.Real age: 14 Mental age: 34 what the heck

oh my jeezus —

real age: 17

mental age: 52

Reblogged from The Science of Deduction

Reblogged from Text Post Blog

swallowbitchpeoplearestarving:

anus:

this bad taxadermy kinda reminds me of aziz ansari

Reblogged from Punk is Dad

(1/1044)
Next »