Reblogged from Think.
Reblogged from Think.

sarahkeilman94:

I’m at the grocery store with my grandparents and my grandpa has wandered away and now my grandma is going up every isle yelling his name and im hiding behind a cookie display cuz i dont want anyone to know im with the crazy woman screaming dick at the top of her lungs

tyleroakley:

entropiaorganizada:

hookteeth:

… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.
So you might end up with more donuts.
But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?
Hrm.
HRM.

A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.
tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

Thank you donut side of Tumblr.

tyleroakley:

entropiaorganizada:

hookteeth:

… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.

So you might end up with more donuts.

But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?

Hrm.

HRM.

A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.

The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (
R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.


tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

Thank you donut side of Tumblr.

benedictedcumberbabeof221:

nosorryihaveepisodestowatch:

the-perks-of-being-a-fangirl2:

the-cat-ninja:

steampoweredcor:

theinsanecrayonbox:

ruthlessamor:

killer-cupcakes:

joponyhere:

yiffinq:

viamadlucem:

phinfrost:

this test has some downright confusing english but it seems to be more or less accurate if you can figure out the questions and answer them right

Real Age: 19Mental Age: 23

real age: 16mental age: 21

Real Age: 14
Mental age: 35
damn

Real Age: 19
Mental age: 34Welp

Real Age: 19
Mental age: 27
Sounds about right. Lawl.

real age: 25
mental age: 30
darn i was almost convinced i’d be younger XD;;; but that’s not so bad, i’m where i should be at least then

Real age: 22Mental age: 31
Too worried they say.

Real Age: 15
Mental Age:24


Very Mature apparently…

Real Age: 19Mental Age: 18Carefree, apparently.

Real age: 14 Mental age: 34 what the heck

oh my jeezus —real age: 17mental age: 52

benedictedcumberbabeof221:

nosorryihaveepisodestowatch:

the-perks-of-being-a-fangirl2:

the-cat-ninja:

steampoweredcor:

theinsanecrayonbox:

ruthlessamor:

killer-cupcakes:

joponyhere:

yiffinq:

viamadlucem:

phinfrost:

this test has some downright confusing english but it seems to be more or less accurate if you can figure out the questions and answer them right

Real Age: 19
Mental Age: 23

real age: 16
mental age: 21

Real Age: 14

Mental age: 35

damn

Real Age: 19

Mental age: 34

Welp

Real Age: 19

Mental age: 27

Sounds about right. Lawl.

real age: 25

mental age: 30

darn i was almost convinced i’d be younger XD;;; but that’s not so bad, i’m where i should be at least then

Real age: 22
Mental age: 31

Too worried they say.

Real Age: 15
Mental Age:24
Very Mature apparently…

Real Age: 19
Mental Age: 18

Carefree, apparently.

Real age: 14 Mental age: 34 what the heck

oh my jeezus —

real age: 17
mental age: 52

Reblogged from Text Post Blog
swallowbitchpeoplearestarving:

anus:

this bad taxadermy kinda reminds me of aziz ansari

swallowbitchpeoplearestarving:

anus:

this bad taxadermy kinda reminds me of aziz ansari

image

Reblogged from Punk is Dad

chapsnats:

THIS IS A BUN APPRECIATION POST

Reblogged from first of all, milk
pottymouthp0sse:

mew2:

why this cat so big

why is this cat so licky

pottymouthp0sse:

mew2:

why this cat so big

why is this cat so licky

Reblogged from MlpRKR